The Democratic Socialists of America is seeking to reshape some of the most basic features of the U.S. economy â from who owns major corporations to how long Americans work and whether families pay for healthcare, college and housing.
The agenda is drawing renewed scrutiny after DSA-backed candidates gained ground in the 2026 midterm primaries and progressive socialism became a central Republican target at the in Dallas.
Below are some of the biggest economic proposals in the platform.
DSA calls for public ownership of major corporations and , arguing public ownership would give Americans greater democratic control over the economy.
Adam Lehodey, a policy expert at the Manhattan Institute, said nationalizing major corporations would cost billions of dollars and shift accountability from customers to government officials.
He argued nationalized industries have historically suffered from waste, corruption and lower productivity, adding that reducing regulations would be a better way to encourage competition.
DSA also wants to establish a 32-hour workweek without reducing workers’ pay or benefits, effectively giving full-time employees an additional day away from work while preserving their compensation.
The proposal is paired with a living minimum wage, paid family leave and stronger protections for workers to form unions and strike.
The agenda does not explain how a shorter workweek would be implemented across industries or how businesses would be expected to absorb the additional labor costs.
Lehodey said a 32-hour workweek without higher productivity could increase labor costs and reduce economic output.
Among DSA’s biggest proposals are universal healthcare, publicly owned social housing, free public education through college and cancellation of all student debt.
Together, the proposals would shift a much larger share of healthcare, housing and education costs from individuals to the federal government.
A Cato Institute analysis estimated that a Medicare-for-All-style healthcare system alone could increase federal spending by between $40 trillion and $75 trillion over a decade, though the estimate is not specific to DSA’s proposal.
DSA says wealthy Americans and large corporations should shoulder more of the cost of its vision.
The platform calls for “aggressive wealth taxes” on the richest individuals and corporations, with the proceeds directed toward public goods and infrastructure.
Lehodey questioned whether alone could finance the agenda, arguing broader taxpayers would likely bear some of the cost.
DSA’s platform does not estimate the total cost of its agenda or how much revenue its proposed tax increases would generate.
